Legal Opinion
Keener v. United States
District Court, D. Montana
Decided September 9, 1998No. CV 97-065-GF-DWMPublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the court is the defendant’s motion for leave to file supplemental expert disclosure. The defendant timely filed an initial expert disclosure statement of Dr. Patrick Lyden. Dr. Lyden’s initial disclosure, dated May 7, 1998 is a summary of his general opinions. His opinions are based on medical records that the plaintiff provided, clinic notes and hospital records from 1991 to 1997.
Dr. Lyden’s second disclosure, dated July 26, 1998, contains Dr. Lyden’s opinions as to the plaintiff’s medical condition after Dr. Ly-den reviewed the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wanderer v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by81 opinions
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- EEOC v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Minebea Co. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Akeva LLC v. Mizuno Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.