Legal Opinion

Frias v. Patenaude & Felix APC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 14, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00805Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 FERNANDO FRIAS, CASE NO. C20-0805-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 PATENAUDE & FELIX APC, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment 16 on liability and Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 33, 34.) Having 17 thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument 18 unnecessary and hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES Defendant’s motion for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. United States v. Larry Roscoe McGlocklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API