Bienek v. Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Bienek appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the North Dakota Department of Transportation’s decision to suspend Bienek’s commercial driving privileges for life. Bienek argues he has not been twice convicted of driving under the influence, and therefore, should not have his commercial driving privileges suspended for life. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On April 26, 1990, Robert Bienek, while driving a noncommercial vehicle, was arrested for driving under the influence (“DUI”). Bienek did not request an administrative hearing before the North Dakota Department of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Dettler v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Ringsaker v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Elshaug v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Bjerklie v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniels v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Christofferson v. North Dakota Department of HealthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Hamre v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Craft v. SimplerSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007