Legal Opinion
Norah Oehmke v. Medtronic, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2016No. 16-1052PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Norah Oehmke appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her suit against Medtronic, Inc., for disability discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRÁ). We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Because this case comes before us on Medtronic’s motion for summary judgment, we portray the facts in the light most favorable to Oehmke. Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006). Oehmke was diagnosed in 1997 with Hodgkin’s lymphoma, for which she received chemotherapy and radiation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Moses v. Dassault Falcon Jet-Wilmington CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Sheena Lipp v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Jennifer Akridge v. Alfa Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Janice Hustvet v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Michael Rinehart v. Kris WeitzellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.