Legal Opinion

Utah Citizens Rate Ass'n v. United States of America & Interstate Commerce Commission

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 6, 1961No. Civ. C-58-60PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, pursuant to procedure prescribed in 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325, seek by this action to have set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which requires the railroads operating in Utah to increase, with certain exceptions, Utah intrastate freight rates in correspondence with increased interstate rates approved by the Commission in three nationwide revenue proceedings designated as Ex Parte Nos. 175, 196 and 206.

Two principal questions are presented for determination by this Court: (1) Whether plaintiffs in the present…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. DiffenbaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Alexander Sprunt & Son, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
  2. State of North Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1962
  3. Wycoff Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1965
  4. Teamsters Joint Council 40 (J.C.) v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Montana Consumer Counsel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API