Legal Opinion
Kendall v. Morton
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from tlie Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit upon three promissory notes of like tenor, one of which reads thus :
“$25.00
Cambridge City, July 1st, 1860.
“ Sis months after date, we, the subscribers, of Cambridge City, county of Wayne, and State of Indiana, promise to pay to the order of Benj. Conklin, 25 dollars, without any relief from valuation or appraisement law's, value received, on behalf of Cambridge City Greys. James M. Cockefair,
“ Reese, Kendall,
“David Conklin, Sect.”
The notes were assigned by Conklin to W. S. T. Morton, who sued upon them.
Conklin, the signers of the notes, or the City Greys, are liable upon them as the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kenyon v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Hobbs v. CowdenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- M'Henry v. DuffieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Board of Commissioners v. ButterworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hays v. CrutcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Hunt v. ListenbergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Swarts v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894