Legal Opinion
Swarts v. Cohen
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 1894No. 1,506Published
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, C. J.
The note upon which this action was brought is in these words:
“National Forge & Iron Co.,
“$1,675.82. Chicago, June 4, 1891.
“Ninety days after date we promise to pay to the order of Samuel Cohen sixteen hundred and seventy-five dollars, payable at our office. Value received.
“National Forge & Iron Co.,
“No. 177. Due-. Mare Swarts,
“President.”
The complaint avers that the note was executed by the *21National Forge and Iron Co. and by Swarts as joint makers; that the note was given for money loaned to the defendant Swarts, and for no other or different consideration, and that no part of the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Metcalf v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Baldwin v. Bank of NewburySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Brockway v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Falk v. MoebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.