Legal Opinion

State v. One Super Cherry Master Video 8-Liner MacHine

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided June 14, 2001No. 03-99-00751-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Powers, Justice

(Assigned).

The State of Texas appeals from a judgment rendered on the jury’s verdict in a forfeiture action brought by the State against property owned by Alvin Ray Fen-ter and P.F.A. Corporation. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 18.18(b)-(g) (West Supp.2001). We will affirm the judgment.

The disputed property consists of thirty-two machines described as “eight liners,” each of which is alleged to be a “gambling device” as that term is defined in section 47.01(4) of the Texas Penal Code; related articles alleged to be “gambling paraphernalia” as defined in section 47.01(6) of the Texas Penal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ames v. AmesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. Wofford, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. In the Interest of C.Q.T.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hardy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. State v. One Super Cherry Master Video 8-Liner MacHineTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Legere v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  5. TWENTY-NINE (29) GAMBLING DEVICES v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API