Legal Opinion
In the Interest of C.Q.T.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 19, 2000No. 10-99-193-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REX D. DAVIS, Chief Justice.
Glynda Marie Floyd filed a motion to modify the conservatorship of her son C.Q.T.M., alleging that she, rather than his father Richard Dean Mitchell, should be his sole managing conservator. A jury failed to find that C.Q.T.M.’s conservator-ship should be modified. Floyd claims in five issues that the court abused its discretion by: (1) admitting in evidence a contempt judgment rendered against Floyd’s husband for failure to pay child support for his own child; (2) admitting in evidence an affidavit executed by her husband relinquishing his parental rights…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Bushell v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Community Initiatives, Inc. v. Chase Bank of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- In the Interest of A.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- In the Interest of J.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.