Legal Opinion
Robert J. Nigg v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Postal Service, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 10, 2003No. 02-3230PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Robert Nigg works for the United States Postal Service as a postal inspector. When the Postal Service ruled him ineligible to receive law enforcement availability pay and suspended his receipt of such pay for a four-week period, he appealed the decertification and suspension decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board. The Board dismissed Mr. Nigg’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We agree with the Board’s legal analysis and affirm its dismissal order.
I
By statute, compensation and benefits for postal inspectors are required to be “maintained on a standard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neal Kenneth Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- David D. Bolton v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Joan Bacashihua v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Max T. Mattern v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ramon J. Martinez v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Contreras v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Welshans v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Nigg v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Alvin L. Kendall vs Thaxton Road LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Mercier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.