Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Murray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The principal and crucial issue on this appeal is whether there was causal negligence on the part of the defendant Murray because of which plaintiffs can be held entitled to recover damages caused by an explosion and fire of a .mixture of petroleum products. For the consideration of that issue it suffices to note the following facts which were established by the evidence without conflict or dispute in any material respect. Fred C. Barnes was employed and lived, since December, 1941, as a tenant farmer on August Grams’ farm, on which he had a tractor operated by using gasoline and another…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Johanson v. Webster Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Delap v. LiebensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Warrichaiet v. Standard Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Radloff v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bruno v. Golden Bell DairyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. McLoone Metal Graphics, Inc. v. Robers Dredge, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Radloff v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API