Legal Opinion
Doko Farms, a Partnership, and James Porter, Alison v. Barnett, L.D. Smith, William T. Curry v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 13, 1992No. 91-5063PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is the latest, but unfortunately not the last, round in this protracted litigation, now in its twelfth year, through which the United States is seeking to recoup from the appellees, Doko Farms and its four individual partners (collectively “Doko”), subsidy payments made to Doko that the United States has determined resulted from a scheme or device to defeat the purpose of the Act under which the payments were made. The recoupment took the form of an offset of the overpayments against subsidy payments due to Doko for subsequent years. The United States…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Charron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- The Rio Grande, El Paso and Santa Fe Railroad Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Amoco Production Company v. Thomas A. Fry, Director, Minerals Management ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Hanover InsuranceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.