Legal Opinion
Altschul v. Paine Webber, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 1980No. 79 Civ. 2852 (MEL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Arthur and Ida Altschul commenced this action in June, 1979, against Paine -Webber, Jackson & Curtis Incorporated, and its parent, Paine Webber Incorporated (Paine Webber) claiming violations of federal securities regulations and common law negligence. The gist of the complaint is that Paine Webber through misrepresentations and other wrongs depleted plaintiffs’ securities account.
Paine Webber brought a third party claim against plaintiffs’ son, Richard Altschul (Richard), who was employed by Paine Webber as a registered representative to service his parents’ account.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Board of Education v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Daily Mirror, Inc. v. New York News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re IorizzoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Hamilton v. Merrill LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Vegetable Kingdom, Inc. v. KatzenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
- Como v. Commerce Oil Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Traveltown, Inc. v. Gerhardt Investment GroupDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.