Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
This is the third appeal after the third trial of an action in trespass for malicious prosecution. Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Company, 354 Pa. 87, 46 A. 2d 674; Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Company, 162 Pa. Superior Ct. 371, 57 A. 2d 571. The jury again found for the plaintiff, and defendant has appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict. We shall set forth the evidence presented on the third trial to show the circumstances out of which the prosecution arose and the sharp conflict in the respective versions of what occurred.
Plaintiff testified that, with her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Curley v. Automobile Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Stinson v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hubert v. the Alta Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohen v. Lit BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Shoop v. Dauphin CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- COHEN v. Lit BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Mort Co. v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Biggans v. Hajoca Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.