Legal Opinion

Calabro v. Socolofsky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 2019No. 945 EDA 2018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.:

Mathew Calabro appeals from the trial court's order sustaining Jon Socolofsky's preliminary objection for lack of personal jurisdiction and dismissing Calabro's complaint. Upon review, we affirm.

*504The relevant facts as summarized by the trial court are set forth below.

[Calabro] and [Socolofsky] were both involved with the asset management firm Delaware Investments. [Calabro] was Chief Compliance Officer of Delaware Investments' Optimum Fund Trust ("Optimum"). Optimum is organized as a Delaware trust with offices in Philadelphia. [Calabro] resided in Pennsylvania during…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Delta Health v. Companions and HomemakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Delta Health v. Companions and HomemakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API