Calabro v. Socolofsky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.:
Mathew Calabro appeals from the trial court's order sustaining Jon Socolofsky's preliminary objection for lack of personal jurisdiction and dismissing Calabro's complaint. Upon review, we affirm.
*504The relevant facts as summarized by the trial court are set forth below.
[Calabro] and [Socolofsky] were both involved with the asset management firm Delaware Investments. [Calabro] was Chief Compliance Officer of Delaware Investments' Optimum Fund Trust ("Optimum"). Optimum is organized as a Delaware trust with offices in Philadelphia. [Calabro] resided in Pennsylvania during…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Delta Health v. Companions and HomemakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Delta Health v. Companions and HomemakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020