Legal Opinion

Grindstaff v. Carter County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The bill in this cause attacked the constitutionality of chapter 492 of the Private Acts of 1925; its caption being as follows:

“An act to he entitled ‘An act to provide for a system of turnpike roads in counties having a population of not less than 21,487 nor more than 21,489 inhabitants by the federal census of 1920, or by any' subsequent federal census; to provide for the management and control of said turnpikes; to create a pike commission for said counties, to have charge of the building, repairing, and maintaining of all of the turnpikes in said counties; to define their duties and to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Prescott v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Cummings v. TrewhittTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Todtenhausen v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Loring v. McGinnessTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Williams v. MabryTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Swaim v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Carr v. State ex rel. ArmourTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API