Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Seeburger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1991No. 16707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This cause originated as an action on account in the Small Claims Division of the Circuit Court of Crawford County. The case involves the sale of twenty-four bales of hay to the defendant, an automobile *732dealer who lives in Illinois. The record indicates that the contract was both made and to be performed in Missouri.

The legal file reflects that a petition was filed on January 25, 1988. A writ of summons was issued the same day. The defendant was served with a copy of the petition and summons by certified mail, restricted delivery. The return receipt indicates the petition and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Josephine Weigner v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Anonymous Ex Rel. Richard v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peter v. Massapequa Water DistrictNassau County District Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API