Legal Opinion

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 31, 2016No. 2014-1856, 2014-1857PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Romag Fasteners, Inc. (“Romag”) owns U.S. Patent No. 5,777,126 (“the '126 patent”) on magnetic snap fasteners, which Romag sells under.its registered trademark, ROMAG. Romag sued Fossil, Inc. and Fossil Stores I, Inc. (together, “Fossil”), along with retailers of Fossil products, alleging, inter alia, patent and trademark infringement. A jury found Fossil liable for both patent and trademark infringement and made’ advisory awards. The district court reduced the patent damages because of Romag’s laches and held as a matter of law that Romag could not recover Fossil’s profits…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. 4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. New York & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Stone Creek, Inc. v. Omnia Italian Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Yah Kai World Wide Enters., Inc. v. NapperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Stone Creek, Inc. v. Omnia Italian Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API