Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Butt's Drug Stores, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1934No. 3932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, was the owner of two high-class blooded dogs of the breed known as “King Charles spaniels.” One was a male named “Big Boy” and one a female named “Susie.”

The appellant, defendant, conducted a pharmacy and dealt in and retailed drugs, medicines, and other merchandise.

Plaintiff visited the drug store of the defendant and inquired of defendant’s manager in charge for Cascara Laxative Tablets ,to administer to her dogs aforesaid. Big Boy was with her at the time and was exhibited to the defendant’s said manager as one of the dogs to which she intended…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Archuleta v. Floersheim Mercantile Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  3. McCallister v. SappingfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Garcia v. Color Tile Distributing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Castillo v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Kaufman v. LanghoferCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API