Legal Opinion

Snook v. Eckley

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mifflin County

Decided July 16, 1969No. 17Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, P. J.,

Defendants’ preliminary objections to plaintiffs’ complaint in ejectment consist of motions to strike off the complaint, for a more specific pleading and for judgment for defendants. The motions, in essence, are based upon three contentions: 1. Insufficient description of the property in question; 2. failure to serve the husband defendant; and 3. the claim for mesne profits is insufficiently pleaded.

The complaint alleges that plaintiffs are the owners in fee of three tracts of land in Yeagertown, Mifflin County, Pa., having thereon erected two dwelling houses known as 221 South…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Atkins v. FlahertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Flynn v. RODKEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Skillman v. MagillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Collins v. BrittinghamSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API