Legal Opinion

Flynn v. RODKEY

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1960No. Appeal, 430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This appeal arises out of an action in ejectment. There was a jury verdict for Doris Flynn, plaintiff appellee. A motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and a motion for a new trial were filed by the defendants, and both were refused.

The plaintiff and defendants are the respective owners of two adjoining lots on Market Street in the Borough of Milesburg. Lot No. 50 is owned by Doris Flynn and lot No. 52 is owned by Isabelle and Robert L. Rodkey. The dispute arose over the location of the common boundary line and the action was instituted to ascertain the ownership of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. BloomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Appeal of Diane B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Berkeihiser v. DIBARTOLOMEROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Computer Print Systems, Inc. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Caine v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API