Legal Opinion

Thompson v. . Ford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court can take no notice of the rights of Ramsour arising out of the filing and prosecution of his bill in the court of equity. It belongs to that court to vindicate its jurisdiction by dealing with persons who violate rights created by a lis pendens there.

Sitting in a court of law, we cannot judicially know how a court of equity will apply an equitable fund of this sort to the satisfaction of creditors, or as between the creditors and the assignee of its owner. We can look only to the legal rights of the parties to this record. But confining ourselves even to that limit, we hold that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayo v. StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Brown v. Graves.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1826

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayo v. StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Rowland Hardware & Supply Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Mayo v. . StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Rowland Hardware & Supply Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Rowland Hardware & Supply Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API