Legal Opinion

Mayo v. . Staton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action for the recovery of real estate, the decision of which was submitted to the court upon a case agreed. On 7 March, 1885, the defendant, Felix Staton, executed two promissory notes to the payees therein named, and for the purpose of securing payment thereof he executed to W. H. Johnston, Esq., a deed conveying the locus in quo, which was duly recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Edgecombe County, upon the following trust: "To have and to hold said land (671) unto said W. H. Johnston, his heirs and assigns, in special trust, however, to hold the same for the uses…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Leak v. . GaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Johnson v. . WhildenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Williams v. . ParsonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. A. A. McKEITHAN & SONS vs. JOHN WALKER & W. J. BROWNSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fowle v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Cornelius v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API