State ex rel. Warr v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
At the time relator suffered his injuries, there were no guardrails or toeboards provided around the sides of the opening in the floor. Relator claims that the failure to provide this safety equipment violated Industrial Commission Rules IC-3-03.03(B), IC-3-03.05 and IC-3-03.09.
There is some disagreement concerning whether the sides of this opening were “unused” within the meaning of those rules. The record shows that at the time of the injuries, a crane was preparing to lower a piece of conveyor equipment down through the opening. But, it is not necessary to consider whether this was a use…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Zito v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. SimichOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lyndhurst v. Lasker-HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Lyburn Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984