Legal Opinion

City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Simich

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1982No. 10473PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P.J.

The defendant-appellant, Keith M. Simich, appeals his conviction in the Cuyahoga Falls Municipal Court for driving under the influence of alcohol (Cuya. Falls Ord. 333.01[A]), based upon a guilty plea “accepted” by the trial court because of Simich’s violation of the conditions of a plea of guilty he had tendered over thirteen months previously pursuant to an alcohol abuse diversionary treatment program (AADTP) conducted by the trial court’s probation department. We reverse.

Facts

Simich was initially arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated on September 6, 1980. He appeared in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HaagOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Warr v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. CaynorOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. GilcreastOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. City of Brook Park v. KirschOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. BrookeOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API