Legal Opinion

Martin v. Rapid Plumbing

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 22, 2006No. 4114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

In this workers’ compensation case, Rapid Plumbing contends the circuit court erred in (1) affirming the appellate panel’s order denying the motion to admit evidence; (2) determining that Ronald Edward Martin was not at maximum medical improvement (MMI); (3) finding Rapid Plumbing improperly terminated temporary total disability benefits; (4) affirming and extending the assessment of penalties; and (5) affirming the commission’s determination of the authorized treating physician. We affirm.

FACTUALIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Martin was a plumber’s helper who had been employed by Rapid…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Hudson ex rel. Hudson v. Lancaster Convalescent CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Hudson Ex Rel. Hudson v. Lancaster Convalescent CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Hudson v. LANCASTER CONVALESCENT CENTERCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API