Legal Opinion

John Sturgeon v. Sue Masica

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 2017No. 13-36165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence by Judge Nguyen

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

John Sturgeon would like to use his hovercraft in a national preserve to reach moose hunting grounds. The State of Alaska is fíne with that;1 the federal government is not. Sturgeon’s case turns on which entity—state or federal—gets to decide the matter. On remand from the Supreme Court, we again conclude that the federal government properly exercised its authority to regulate hovercraft use on the rivers within conservation system units in Alaska.

I

A

The Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve conservation system unit (“Yukon-Charley”) is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Sturgeon v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Sturgeon v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. Eugene MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. John Sturgeon v. Bert FrostCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Michael Ray Scott v. Gene Ward, Seward County Sheriff, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API