Legal Opinion

Ducosin v. Mott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1982No. 77-4-184, CA 16290, SC 27657PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The principal issue is whether a defamatory communication made to a county medical examiner suggesting a possible homicide is absolutely privileged. The trial court held that it was not, found the defendant acted maliciously, and awarded the plaintiff damages. The Court of Appeals held the communication was absolutely privileged and reversed. 49 Or App 369, 619 P2d 678 (1980), 50 Or App 207, 622 P2d 763 (1981). We affirm the Court of Appeals.

There was animosity and litigation between the parties caused by the defendant’s father bequeathing property to plaintiffs mother. The mother died in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cox v. Royal TribeOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Moore v. West Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ducosin v. MottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Ducosin v. MottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fridovich v. FridovichSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. v. WitherspoonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  4. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Allen v. OrtezUtah Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API