Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. v. Witherspoon
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent obtained a $55,500 general verdict against appellants predicated on defamation and interference with prospective contractual relations. Appellants contend that the district court committed prejudicial error by admitting into evidence a letter from Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. to the Nevada Employment Security Department, and by leaving certain questions of privilege to the jury. We agree with appellants, and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.
THE FACTS
In December 1979, respondent Witherspoon was working in Reno for appellant Circus Circus Hotels, Inc., as a craps…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Georgia Power Co. v. BusbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Sias v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Fairbanks Publishing Company v. FranciscoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by77 opinions
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Arochem International, Inc., Arochem Corporation and William R. Harris v. Harold W. BuirkleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.