Legal Opinion

Clark Hardware Co. v. Centennial Tunnel Mining Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1912No. 3510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Gilpin District Court. Hon. Charles ■ C. McCall, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Judge.

March 2, 1905, appellant brought suit in the county court of Gilpin county to foreclose its mechanic’s lien on a portion of the Hamlet Lode claim, a lease-hold interest therein alleged to belong to the Hillside Mining and Milling Company, and the improvements and fixtures, consisting of buildings and mining machinery situate on said claim. To this complaint defendant Frank answered, alleging ownership of the buildings and machinery. The Centennial Tunnel Mining Company answered, admitting ownership of the real estate, and denying ownership of the fixtures or equipment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Western Railway v. SistrunkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Anglo-American Packing v. Turner Casing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Delahay v. GoldieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayutin v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. FIRST NAT. BANK IN FT. COLLINS v. Sam McClure & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API