Legal Opinion

Delahay v. Goldie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

M'ror from Leavenworth District Court. All material facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Goldie as plaintiff, had judgment against Taggart and the Delahays, at the November Term 1874. The Delahays bring the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action by Goldie to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. M. W. Delahay was the' owner, J. P. Taggart the contractor, and Goldie claimed as sub-contractor. The latter made Taggart, M. W. Delahay, and Louisiana/ Delahay, parties defendant. He recovered a personal judgment against Taggart, and a portion of this amount was ad*264judged a lien upon the premises. A decree of foreclosure and sale was entered against all the defendants. Taggart is not here complaining of the judgment, and of course we need not inquire whether any error was committed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weaver v. SellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Short v. NoonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Dorman v. CrozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Shellabarger v. ThayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Clark v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. FisherdickNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Clough v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Fossett v. Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Chicago Lumber Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Hoggson Bros. v. Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API