Legal Opinion

Kalin & Feldman, Inc. v. Herbert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1924No. Appeal, No. 192PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

There are two questions to be determined on this appeal by defendant, whether the charge of the court on the question of damages was adequate and whether the exception taken to that portion of the charge by appellant affords a sufficient basis for review.

The action was assumpsit for silk sold and delivered and for damages for breach of contract by failure of defendant to accept and pay for the remainder of the silk alleged to have been purchased.

In the disposition we shall make of the case, many of the facts connected with the transaction need not be outlined.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Gerber v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Hockenberry v. New Castle Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Shimer v. Penn Electric Smelting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Milyak v. Philadelphia Rural Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Huessener v. Fishel & Marks Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Krajkowski v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Raftery v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API