Milyak v. Philadelphia Rural Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
This suit was originally brought by Anna Hale in her own behalf and that of her minor son to recover damages against defendant for negligently causing the death of her husband, Thomas W. Hale. Subsequent to the commencement of the proceeding Anna Hale died, her death was suggested of record and Paul A. Milyak, her administrator, was substituted as plaintiff. This was proper. Where a widow has brought such an action for damages for the death of her husband and pending the suit the widow dies, her administrator may properly be substituted as plaintiff; or the suit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Pauza v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Glasco v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Meholiff v. River Transit CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Dornon v. McCarthySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Tauber v. WilkinsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Brown v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Kowtko v. Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.