Legal Opinion

United States v. Dorothy Schankowski

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1986No. 85-1208PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Chief Judge.

In this case we must decide whether the statute which makes obstruction of the mails a crime requires a showing that the defendant knew that her acts would result in obstructing or retarding the passage of mail. The statute is 18 U.S.C. § 1701 (1982):

Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs or retards the passage of the mail, or any carrier or conveyance carrying the mail, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

I

Four checks issued by the Michigan Department of Social Services were stolen before they reached the persons to whom…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. United States v. YermianSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. CassidyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Hiram Stanley Sasser, IICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Anthony WoodenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Upshaw, AllenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Jerri K. McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API