Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Dravis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court.- — Hugh Brennan and W. H. McHenry, Judges. We pretermit the usual preliminary statement, because, as will presently appear, we should be enabled to make it only by an examination of the entire record.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

The threshing machine company, appellee, brought action upon written contract for a balance due of $304. This much is revealed by the argument for appellee, and, no doubt, it might be gleaned by a careful examination of the abstract. Why an appeal is taken can be ascertained only by a thorough examination of the entire abstract, and a careful reading of the arguments in extenso, made on both sides. In no other way can be ascertained what the appellant complains of. There is literally no at*475tempt to outline a single error relied on for reversal, nor an attempt to state a single brief point. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Campbell v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. KrammeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Bourrett v. W. M. Bride Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Pascoe v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API