Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Davis
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 20, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Adams District Court. — Thomas L. Maxwell, Judge. For reasons stated later, a statement of the case in brief, the issues, and their determination, is not made here.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
Appeal and JSrror : briefs: disregard of ruies. Rule 53 requires the brief of appellant to contain “a short and clear statement disclosing:”
A.“The nature of the action.”
B. “What the issues were.”
C. “ITow the issues were decided.”
D. “A brief and concise statement of so much of the facts as fully presents the errors and exceptions relied upon.”
E. “The errors relied upon for a reversal.”
The rule provides further that:
“Following this the brief shall contain, under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately numbered propositions or points, stated concisely, and without argument or…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. DravisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918