Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Michigan Capital Medical Center

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2000No. Docket 217826, 217975, 218240, 218270PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals involving medical malpractice cases, defendants-appellants appeal by leave granted from orders denying their motions for summary disposition. We reverse and remand because we conclude that in each case defendants-appellants were entitled to summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (claim barred because of statute of limitations).

Each defendant asserts entitlement to summary disposition on the basis that plaintiffs failed to file with their complaints affidavits of merit required by MCL 600.2912d; MSA 27A.2912(4), and thus failed to timely file proper…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lindsey v. Harper HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Washoe Medical Center v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Watermark Senior Living Ret. Cmtys., Inc. v. Morrison Mgmt. Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Rataj v. City of RomulusMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Geralds v. Munson HealthcareMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Mouradian v. GoldbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API