Legal Opinion

Papa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 1988No. Appeal 2127 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Esther Papa (Claimant) petitions this Court for review of an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee denying Claimants compensation claim. We affirm the Boards order.

Claimant was hired by Franklin Mint Corporation (Employer) in May 1978 as a clerk in the “greenware” department, wherein porcelain products are manufactured. Her duties entailed typing, filing, answering the telephone and handling the payroll. Employer assigned an additional clerk, Peg Hladky (Hladky) to greenware in 1981. Her duties included the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Haney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Bevilacqua v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Papa v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Supinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Lukens Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API