Legal Opinion

Burr v. Burr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1952No. 35150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

The instant case involves the validity of a temporary attorney’s fee allowed by the trial court in a divorce action. There is no controversy over the facts. From the record it appears that on September 1, 1950, Marguerite Burr filed a divorce action against her husband, C. W. Burr, and that she employed Miskovsky & Mis-kovsky to prosecute her action. In her petition she set out and described a considerable amount of property held by her husband which she claimed was community property, and asked the court to enter an order directing the defendant to pay to her attorneys the sum of $750 as her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Brown v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanska v. HanskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API