Legal Opinion
Bahrenfus v. Bachik
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 20, 1991No. 88-C-11410, 88-C-11825, 89-C-10175, 88-C-11971, 89-C-10176, 89-C-10172 CA A61824 (Control), CA A61827, CA A61830, CA A61831, CA A61834, CA A61838PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Plaintiffs are patients in the Oregon State Hospital. Each pled guilty, except for insanity, to the crime charged. The court placed each under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board. Under ORS 161.327, the Board has jurisdiction over each plaintiff for a period equal to the maximum sentence provided by statute for the crime to which each pled guilty, except for insanity. The Board committed each to the Oregon State Hospital for the maximum time for which the person could have been incarcerated in the penitentiary.
Each plaintiff filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Fox v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Moore v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Jones v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Colby v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- McClaflin v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Cook v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- McClaflin v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991