Legal Opinion

Squaw Gulch Mining & Milling Co. v. Kollberg

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1930No. Civil No. 2841PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

F. B. Kollberg, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against David Fishman and Squaw Gulch Mining & Milling Company, a corporation, the latter being hereinafter called defendant, to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $2,500, which note was executed by Fishman in favor of plaintiff and indorsed and guaranteed by defendant in the following language:

“For-value received we hereby guarantee the payment of the within note and any renewal of same, and hereby waive protest, demand and notice of nonpayment thereof.
“[Signed] SQUAW GULCH MINING & MILLING COMPANY,
“By CHAS. L. HARDY,
“Presiden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Thomas v. NewcombArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Thomas v. City National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. First Baptist Church v. ConnorArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spillsbury v. School District No. 19Arizona Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API