Legal Opinion
Squaw Gulch Mining & Milling Co. v. Kollberg
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1930No. Civil No. 2841PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
F. B. Kollberg, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against David Fishman and Squaw Gulch Mining & Milling Company, a corporation, the latter being hereinafter called defendant, to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $2,500, which note was executed by Fishman in favor of plaintiff and indorsed and guaranteed by defendant in the following language:
“For-value received we hereby guarantee the payment of the within note and any renewal of same, and hereby waive protest, demand and notice of nonpayment thereof.
“[Signed] SQUAW GULCH MINING & MILLING COMPANY,
“By CHAS. L. HARDY,
“Presiden…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Thomas v. NewcombArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Thomas v. City National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- First Baptist Church v. ConnorArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spillsbury v. School District No. 19Arizona Supreme Court · 1930