Silva v. City of Fall River
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCypher, J.
Paul F. Silva, a licensed funeral director, filed a complaint under G. L. c. 231A against the city of Fall River and its board of health (collectively, Fall River) alleging that the twenty-dollar burial permit fee charged by Fall River is an illegal tax and seeking declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and damages. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment and a Superior Court judge entered judgment in favor of Fall River, concluding that the burial permit charge was a valid regulatory fee and not an unlawful tax. Silva appeals. We think that the summary judgment record…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Miller v. MooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. PlaistedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Silva v. City of AttleboroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- SDCO St. Martin, Inc. v. City of MarlboroughDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Silva v. City of AttleboroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Coakley-Rivera v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
- Knott v. Town of NorthbridgeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005