Legal Opinion
United States v. Ferguson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 30, 2007No. Criminal No. 3:06CR137 (CFD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTIONS TO SEVER
CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge.
The government and defendants Ferguson, Garand, Graham, Monrad, and Milton filed eighteen motions in limine in accordance with the Court’s pre-trial scheduling orders. These defendants have also joined in many of their co-defendants’ motions. The Court now addresses the defendants’ motion to exclude the government’s Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) (“Rule 404(b)” or “404(b)”) evidence, their motion to exclude evidence of recorded conversations, Milton, Monrad, and Ferguson’s motions to sever either defendant Garand or…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Walker v. SchultDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- United States v. PughDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Hart v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.