Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corp. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1978No. Appeals, Nos. 1389, 1390, 1395 and 1415 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

At the heart of these consolidated appeals is the following fundamental question: Under what circumstances may the Commonwealth order a landowner or an occupier of land to correct a condition existing on his land which is causing pollution of Commonwealth waters, where such polluting condition was created by the conduct of someone other than the owner or occupier? It .is before us by way of an adjudication and order of the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) which sustained in part and dismissed in part the appeals of Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation (Gum),…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. SmithKline Beckman Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania Retailers' Ass'n v. LazinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Adams Sanitation v. DEPT. OF ENV. PROT.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. DeLoachCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Holland Enterprises, Inc. v. JokaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API