Legal Opinion

Adams Sanitation v. DEPT. OF ENV. PROT.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1998No. 0044 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether a party who leases a parcel of land and operates a business on that parcel can be required to abate ground water contamination pursuant to Section 316 of the Clean Streams Law1 where the record fails to demonstrate that the party was either responsible for or knew of the contamination. Because this Court finds that Section 316 permits the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”)2 to order an owner or occupier of the contaminated land to remedy the condition caused by pollution, regardless of fault…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Shearer v. NaftzingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Eagle Environmental II, L.P. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Nicoletti v. Allegheny County Airport AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Eqt Prod. Co. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. of the Com. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API