Legal Opinion

Kraus v. Clark

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1908No. 15,170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Sherman county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Root, C.

Suit for balance alleged to be due plaintiff from defendants, who are husband and wife, for wages earned by plaintiff’s minor son while in defendants’ employ. Plain*576tiff recovered judgment for $34.50 against O. A. Clark, and said defendant appeals.

Tlie errors assigned may be properly grouped under three heads: (1) That the court erred in permitting plaintiff to open and close the case; (2) that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; and (3) in refusing to grant a new trial for newly discovered evidence.

1. The allegations in the pleadings are somewhat indefinite, and in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. ClemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Zweibel v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Parkins v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Davey v. DaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burgoyne v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. O'Conner v. WitteNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API