Legal Opinion
Moseley v. Abrams
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1985No. A018021PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
Tomlinson Irving Moseley and Dorothy Barbara Moseley, owners of an apartment complex in the City of Corte Madera, appeal from an order of dismissal entered after the superior court sustained, without leave to amend, architect Ned H. Abrams’ demurrer to their “Third Amendment to Complaint” (hereinafter complaint) on the ground that the action— one based on breach of contract—was time-barred by the 10-year limitations period prescribed in Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15. Appellants contend that the section, construed in light of its legislative history and public policy…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Pulver v. Avco Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Kirby v. Albert D. Seeno Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.