Legal Opinion

Freece v. Clackamas County

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 25, 2006No. Civ. 04-1666-JEPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JELDERKS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Robert Ian Freece brings claims for civil rights violations, false imprisonment, and battery against defendants Clackamas County (the County), Sergeant Kim Klusmann, the City of Wil-sonville (the City), Floyd Peoples, and Charles Jacoby.

Defendants move for summary judgment. Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment on liability. I grant the City defendants’ motion for summary judgment. I deny plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and the County defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

CITY DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API