Legal Opinion
Shirley v. Lavine
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 26, 1973No. 72-CV-163PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PORT, District Judge.
Memorandum-Decision and Order
The Supreme Court vacated a judgment of this court 1 which declared 18 NYCRR § 369.2(f) (3) (ii) (e) 2 invalid as establishing AFDC eligibility requirements in conflict with provisions of the Social Security Act, and remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of Chapter 687 of the 1972 Laws of New York (New York Social Services Law § 101-a, as amended), 3 McKinney’s Consol.Laws. c. 55 which had become effective subsequent to this court’s decision.
In order to reactivate the matter in the district court after the remand,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harmon v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Holley v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Simpson v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Holley v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Rush v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Rush v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.