Legal Opinion

Vance v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 2008No. A07-1552PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Appellant Philip Vance appeals the district court’s summary denial of his petition for postconvietion relief. We affirm.

Vance was convicted in 2004 of the December 22, 2002, murder of Khaled Al-Bakri. 1 In his direct appeal, Vance asserted that the district court erred by (1) excluding alternative-perpetrator evidence and reverse-Spreigl evidence; (2) allowing, without providing a cautionary instruction, testimony that State witnesses were fearful; (3) failing to give an instruction regarding unredacted police statements that suggested Vance was untruthful; and (4)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Nissalke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Jason Donald Matakis v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API